Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts

Saturday, March 24, 2007

on technology...

We, women are selling ourselves short. We have started to oppress other women. Women no longer need men to feel inferior, insecure and violated. We call each other hoes and bitches freely without realizing that this gives men more reason to look at us and call us hoes ad bitches; an object for their own satisfaction. Worst, our biology works against us. If we are unmarried or have no prospect by the time we are 30, we succumb to the mercy of unmarried men because we feel the pressure to get hitched, have a family before the whole cycle ends. We add problems to our already distressed life because we see our life culminates with the birth and growth of a child. We tell ourselves that then and only then can we experience the “essence” of being a “woman”, as one Miss Universe contestant puts it.

All of which are social constructs, created by men and sustained by women. Married or attached women have the tendency to look down at their single friends. Either because they want us to experience the “joy” that they are experiencing or they are being judgmental and conclude that the reason why we are still single is because we are being picky and unreasonable. Yes, some women are picky and unreasonable. However, the point is, why even go there? What compels these women to feel the need to pity their single friends? As Heidegger puts it, “Meanwhile man, precisely as the one so threatened, exalts himself to the posture of lord of the earth”. There is this need not only for man but also for women to solidify themselves and their reality by exerting it over another woman. Could the married woman be living a life of quiet desperation? That her idea of “happily ever after”, perished or never existed? For one brief moment, while she looks down on another woman she feels happy, but the reality is, she is looking at herself, at her own lifeless reality. We have fashioned ourselves to safebeing, faking ourselves towards living. We defend our reality by pretending to be someone else. We buy the clothes we need, we hope and dream for our knight-in-shinning-armor to appear and seize us away from our life of quiet desperation. In turn, we end up not facing our own reality. Our fear of abandonment has carried us to its core, we have abandoned ourselves.

We are living in quiet desperation on our own for too long, forgetting to see that it is not only us that suffer. Even those women who seem to be perfect and together is suffering, for the standards imposed on us is unreal. As we women perfect the art of hiding imperfection, we have lost our true-selves and focused on the unreal. We have placed it upon ourselves to reach into the abyss without realizing the impending danger. Our illusion of happiness moved us to equate it to marriage or relationships. It seems that only with a partner can we be whole when a partner should multiply our sense of self and not just add. Moreover, we needed not only to define and calculate what is beautiful; we created other definitions of beauty. Created to serve as an alternative, but as Goths, EMOs and punk exists, it also assert the unreal. Moreover, these assertions not only bring into the spotlight the unreal but also have its own standard of what is real. These standards are to exclude the “posers” the very thing the Goths, EMOs and punk once were. We just created more spaces for exclusion.

In order to regain what we lost, we do not need to look at other people for what we lost or do not have, all we need is to look at ourselves. Look at what we are doing, the judgments we imposed on other people and project it towards ourselves. No more escaping the truth of our own existence. However, more than this, we should look at how everyone else’s around us suffers. Place judgment where it should be. Blame photoshoped pictures showing unreal definition of beauty or of women. Look at a photograph and see what is real. Moreover, to live outside the comfort of our home and experience, to let being be. As Heidegger said, be a poet. No longer bounded by the guise of life, but see what is concealed; the art of imperfection and the beauty of the ugly. As such, we should not let go of what people say is wrong, “… where the danger is… the saving power is also”.

For Heidegger, it is his own fear of death that made him look at what they have done and reminisce of a time where immortality is at his hands. It also just as important for us women, to dream and to fantasize for it is then do we challenge the reality we have created. It is then can we poets, grounding ourselves on what is and seeing more, of what it should be. As poets, we should create space for inclusion, fashioning ourselves to find what is real and including other people. We then, should will more than willing, letting Beings be.

Thursday, February 8, 2007

Concerning Technology

for my Philo 102, we are currently discussing, concerns of mankind (or Heidegger) regarding technology. I am so glad that Heidegger worked in a time where computers, blogs and modern day printers does not exist. Then, he is not able to flood us with his heideggerisms. He has a serious writing problem with a weird sense of logic (or maybe its just the translation). anyway, he is a pain to read.

moving on...

Every single day (or just maybe during class time), i am bombarded how man as being challenge the standing reserve and wills to risk. Man as being risks even more than life itself. The reality of which is very apparent. we see, if only we take heed, the lengths man takes to make himself comfortable. we have take it upon itself to look at God's creation, admire it and strip it piece by piece in front of him. Worst, by taking the piece we not only destroy his work but also damage the very thing he loves the most, man.

The demand for technology did not only resulted to man's ego centric behavior in relation to nature, but it compelled us to look at each other and see the standing reserve. No longer the person, but a thing, a resource.

if only we take heed. Heidegger says.

I take heed every single time. in trying to be a development studies major, i take heed all the time for looking at persons as resource causes or caused underdevelopment. I learn about how we are exploited, to exploit in a "developing way" and to use all of this to our advantage. on the hind sight, i also learn to use all of my learning to MY advantage. Why? cause studying Development is painful. Not physically but emotionally. damn, my women hormones.

the funny things is, Philo being a required subject, we the students, are thrown into the abyss and into desolate time. a time where learning is secondary to earning grades and become "educated". how do teachers see us?

as statistics.

as letter grades.

as people who they fill with water, like a bucket in a finite well.

My teacher, though he is one of the best teachers i have ever had, unconsciously (or maybe consciously, i don't know) tell us how he looks at as and makes us feel like a standing reserve. He's "list" of class standing amuses him as students move up and down the ladder. So he says. How the middle ten is the "average an**n students" like we need to be reminded of how to perform and how many is in front of us in the "line". Line, that we don't even know if necessary or where it leads to. Crap.

He then insults the entirety of my Being, by stressing the importance of grades as not the measure of personhood. yes, sir, its not. But as of this moment, where we students will and try to risk, will always be reminded of how IMPORTANT it is to perform. for the world sees, at first hand, performance and not personhood.

Maybe it is my fault for focusing on academics and not stretching more. Maybe that is really the reason why I'm pissed. But anyway, what is important is how as Beings, man consciously and unconsciously sees each other as standing reserve, a resource. for laughter, comfort or like this blog, for rantings.

as for "why poets"...

"many times, man risks more than life itself"

This is regarding man, focusing on one side of life. Purifying life as they say. as if suffering does not exists. i am always reminded of capitalists/feudal lords/absolute monarchy. as such, i am growing up to be a Marxist. But my POSteacher said to me, everyone in college is "some kind of a Marxist" and depending on their affiliations with Marxist organizations, we grow out of it. anyway, back on the topic. think way back. the time where is you are not born with the right kind of stars, you are nothing. and if you have the stars you only thought of yourself and nothing else. you exploit people as if they are your animals and is domesticated.

just researched about heidegger, i am always reminded of how his analysis is similar to that of a Marxist. Well anyway, he was part of the Nazi movement (by choice or by force) which explains a lot why he can write about man destrorying man. But that also gives light, that SOME germans, where a bit consoling. :)